Intego -- the Inside Track

Take Note…

CLASSIFYING EMPLOYEES THE RIGHT WAY! 
By Leah Powell contributing writer and Tax Principle at The Bonadio Group

Do you have any independent contractors working for you?
If so, please note that the IRS is increasing their focus on worker classification. The consequences of misclassifying workers are significant to the worker, the employer and governmental agencies. Misclassifying contractors or even temporary laborers that the IRS feels should be treated as employees can cost you big dollars in payroll taxes, penalties and interest.

Upcoming IRS Audits Focusing on Worker Classification
Beginning in February 2010 the IRS is launching an examination of 6,000 randomly selected companies to focus on employment tax issues ranging from executive compensation to fringe benefits. The IRS will perform an examination of 2,000 random companies per year over the next three years. Companies targeted will be of varying sizes and include both for profit and non-profit employers. While these audits can target any reporting aspect of the tax return the IRS's primary focus will be on worker classification, executive compensation, fringe benefits, non-filers and reimbursed expenses.

FROM JUMP...

Hiring people as independent contractors vs employees has a significant financial impact for both employers and workers.  The classification of workers as independent contractors relieves employers from withholding federal income and payroll taxes, paying the employer's share of FICA taxes on the wages plus FUTA tax, and often providing the worker with fringe benefits such as health insurance and overtime pay. There may be state tax obligations as well. From a financial perspective it is certainly appealing to try to build a case for classifying workers as independent contractors. However employers should consider the possible payroll tax (and penalty) ramifications should they not be able to support their employment classifications upon examination.

Keep in mind that the IRS isn't the only one interested in how workers are classified.
The IRS has come out with a new form in 2009 (Form 8919, Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages) allowing workers who feel they were misclassified as independent contractors to report their share of uncollected social security and Medicare taxes due on their compensation. They would pay their half of the uncollected social security and Medicare tax with their personal return (as opposed to the full SE tax) and the IRS would likely come knocking on businesses doors for the other half!

So who is an "employee" for purposes of employment classification purposes ?
The classification of an employee vs an independent contractor is not easily defined and is subject to a facts and circumstances analysis. However, the IRS has a 160 page internal training guide for its agents to help classify workers. While initially drafted in October 1996 it is still being used by agents today and will likely see increased use in their upcoming examinations.

Per this guide a worker is an employee if he or she is a common law employee, corporate officer, statutory employee or employee covered by agreement under section 218 of the Social Security Act. Under common law the treatment of a worker as an independent contractor or employee depends on whether the employer has the right to direct and control the work of the worker.

The IRS looks to three categories of evidencing in determining whether there is a right to direct and control a worker:
Behavioral control - who has the right to direct or control how the worker performs a task such as when and where to do the work, what tools or equipment to use, how to accomplish the task at hand, etc.

Financial control - who has the financial control of activities undertaken, is any significant investment required by the worker, who bears the cost of business expenses, is payment for services guaranteed or paid on an hourly basis or flat fee basis, does the worker have opportunity for profit or loss, etc.

Relationship of the parties - what is the intent of the parties, is there a written, contractual agreement, are there employee benefits (paid vacation, participation in tax-qualified retirement plans, etc.), what are the discharge or termination policies concerning the worker, is the work done by the worker integral to the employer's business that can't easily be done by others?

Are you comfortable in your worker classification abilities?
Now would be a good time to proactively review your company's current payroll procedures and seek outside expertise regarding the targeted tax areas, if necessary.


Disclaimer: The Bonadio Group provides the information in Viewpoints for general guidance only, and does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action, you should consult a professional adviser who has been provided with all pertinent facts relevant to your particular situation. Tax articles in Viewpoints are not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding accuracy-related penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. The information is provided "as is," with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.

 

Client Testimonials…

“All of us here really appreciate how you keep us updated at all times with any referrals we send you. We know whenever you get the referral our clients are in great hands and are never left wondering what’s going on.”


Brendan A., Mill Valley, CA (payroll service bureau partner)

Industry Speak…

Some ups and downs of the workers’ comp marketplace.  Where are your clients & prospects located?
New Jersey WC rates (down)
California WC assessments (up)
Pennsylvania WC rates (down)
Connecticut loss cost to policyholders (up)

Contact Intego to get the best premium for your clients – click here for contact info

 


Interesting Tidbit…

Some USA 2010 Olympic Athletes to Watch
Shani Davis (Chicago, IL) – Speed Skating
Tucker Fredericks (Janesville, WI) – Speed Skating
Apolo Ohno (Seattle, WA) – Short Track Speed Skating
Lindsey Vonn (Vail, CO) – Alpine Skiing
Bode Miller (Sugar Hill, NH) – Alpine Skiing
Bill Demong (Lake Placid, NY) – Nordic Combined
Kikkan Randall (Anchorage, AK) – Nordic Skiing
Andy Newell (Shaftsbury, VT) – Nordic Skiing
Evan Lysacek (Los Angeles, CA) – Figure Skating
Hannah Teter (Belmont, VT) - Snowboarding
Shaun White (Carlsbad, CA) – Snowboarding

More Info

Mark Benotti
National Director, Business Development

view profile

Ask Us...

Question – Is the insurance audit eliminated with pay-as-you-go workers’ comp?

Answer – Insurance companies retain the right to audit their clients.  Sometimes state laws dictate how many they audit and how they audit (i.e., in-person, phone, or paper).  Pay-as-you-go workers’ comp does not remove the insurance carriers’ right nor does it alter state laws but what it does do is make the audit simpler, require less time and effort by the client, and much smoother.  With Intego’s involvement, many times the audits are “checked-off” by the insurance company and the customer is never involved.  We can’t make the audit go away, but we make is easier for the client!
Tips/other information –

  • Construction typically has more physical audits than other industries.
  • 1099 exposure is the #1 reason for additional premium due (so save your certificates).
  • Be sure that if you are included as an officer that you either pay through wage or prepare for the premium at end of year.
 

Integowww.integoinsurance.com

Toll Free Phone: 888.298.2939
Toll Free Fax: 888.289.2955
Email: info@integoinsurance.com

[CONTENT]